Topic summary
ā 41% 7 analyzed articles/videos 12,994 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign Influence Operations results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 4,375 hits . Analysis detected 34,624 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,035 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ā 8% (21,010 of 22,702 topics). This Foreign Influence Operations is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group. Foreign Influence Operations
Topic details
Total words: 56,035
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.5% percentile 1.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles56K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst