Topic summary
64% 95 analyzed articles/videos 42,668 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Finance results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 16,948 hits . Analysis detected 170,048 faulty-reasoning hits from 216,334 analyzed words across 95 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 17% (18,744 of 22,505 topics). This Finance is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group. Finance
Topic details
Total words: 216,334
Article count: 95
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score95 analyzed articles216.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst