Publication summary
58%9 analyzed articles/videos677 analyzed words
BS Summary: These azfamily results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 319 hits. Analysis detected 1,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,820 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 74% (150 of 556 publications). This azfamily is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
azfamily
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%The Trace1%
1%BridgeDetroit1%
74%azfamily (selected)3%
100%The White House9%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

73% percentile
025507510073.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score9 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Publication 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Publication 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate