Author summary
1%1 analyzed article/video131 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gibby Parra results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 1.9% saturation with 10 hits. Analysis detected 20 faulty-reasoning hits from 524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (7,696 of 8,970 authors). This Gibby Parra is better (less manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
Gibby Parra
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Tabitha Mueller1%
0%Michael Fox1%
15%Gibby Parra (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 524
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

14% percentile
025507510014.2% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles524 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos