Author summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Sarabia results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 191 faulty-reasoning hits from 244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (307 of 8,707 authors). This Steven Sarabia is worse (more manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group.
Steven Sarabia
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠97%Steven Sarabia (selected)12%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 244
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

97% percentile
025507510096.5% percentile
11.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles244 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 22.1%22.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.6%6.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 15.6%15.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.6%6.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.1%13.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Author 22.1%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Author 15.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos