Author summary
16% 11 analyzed articles/videos 3,023 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evan Spear results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,524 hits . Analysis detected 4,381 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,766 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 6% (8,437 of 8,960 authors). This Evan Spear is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group. Evan Spear
Author details
Total words: 12,766
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.8% percentile 1.0% BS Score11 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.0% 0.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 11.9%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst