Topic summary
86% 11 analyzed articles/videos 8,759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Film Criticism results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 4,755 hits . Analysis detected 38,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,623 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 49% (12,116 of 23,346 topics). This Film Criticism is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group. Film Criticism
Topic details
Total words: 31,623
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score11 analyzed articles31.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.7% 11.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst