Author summary
86% 28 analyzed articles/videos 13,326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dyer Oxley results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 5,474 hits . Analysis detected 57,184 faulty-reasoning hits from 62,887 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 31% (5,967 of 8,557 authors). This Dyer Oxley is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group. Dyer Oxley
Author details
Total words: 62,887
Article count: 28
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score28 analyzed articles62.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst