Author summary
0% 19 analyzed articles/videos 4,479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patricia Murphy results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 1,723 hits . Analysis detected 18,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,389 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,682 of 9,471 authors). This Patricia Murphy is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group. Patricia Murphy
Author details
Total words: 18,389
Article count: 19
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score19 analyzed articles18.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.9% 1.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst