Author summary
62%1 analyzed article/video357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Giancarlo Sopo results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 288 hits. Analysis detected 1,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (2,290 of 8,853 authors). This Giancarlo Sopo is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Giancarlo Sopo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
75%Giancarlo Sopo (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,428
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510074.1% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 20.2%20.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 8.8%8.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%No True Scotsman: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos

The Grift at the Gate52%
Quillette63%By Giancarlo Sopo62%7/23/2026, 3:28:29 PM