Topic summary
40% 13 analyzed articles/videos 6,996 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fatal Shooting results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 2,580 hits . Analysis detected 22,506 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,451 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (19,850 of 22,393 topics). This Fatal Shooting is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group. Fatal Shooting
Topic details
Total words: 37,451
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.4% percentile 1.3% BS Score13 analyzed articles37.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst