Author summary
3%3 analyzed articles/videos520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caitlin Lilly results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 468 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,080 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 33% (6,125 of 9,103 authors). This Caitlin Lilly is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Caitlin Lilly
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
33%Caitlin Lilly (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,080
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

33% percentile
025507510032.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.6%1.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate