Pedestrian killed in suspected DUI crash near Las Vegas Strip 4%

By Caitlin Lilly3%

7/22/2026, 5:42:46 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Appeal to Authority, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 75 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of 4% (29,494 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the article peer group.

A pedestrian was killed in a suspected DUI crash early Wednesday morning near the Las Vegas Strip, according to police. 
The Metropolitan Police Department said the crash occurred at about 3:17 a.m. at Sammy Davis Jr. and Resorts World drives. 
The pedestrian was transported to a local hospital, where they were pronounced dead. 
“Officers on scene have a driver detained for impairment investigation,” police stated. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.8%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 26.7%Caitlin Lilly: 3.8%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 3.8%Framing Effect26.7%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.7%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 1.3%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.5%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 1.5%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 4.9%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.0%Caitlin Lilly: 1.4%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 3.1%Appeal to Authority16.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 6.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 26.7%Caitlin Lilly: 1.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.9%Begging the Question26.7%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 1.1%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 1.6%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 16.0%Caitlin Lilly: 1.4%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.1%Unattributed Quote16.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 1.6%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caitlin Lilly: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

75 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker16%attributed speech63writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
12 attributed words100% of attributed speech32% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Metropolitan Police Department: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.