Author summary
65%1 analyzed article/video519 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DAVID PHILLIP Associated Press results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 1,465 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 58% (3,713 of 8,778 authors). This DAVID PHILLIP Associated Press is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
DAVID PHILLIP Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
58%DAVID PHILLIP Associated Press (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,076
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.7%1.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Special Pleading: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos