Publication summary
29% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KMBC results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 1,113 hits . Analysis detected 8,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,468 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 31% (387 of 553 publications). This KMBC is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 19,468
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.1% percentile 1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst