Author summary
20% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Wayne Ferguson results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 1,140 hits . Analysis detected 9,302 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,680 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 6% (8,124 of 8,600 authors). This John Wayne Ferguson is better (less manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group. John Wayne Ferguson
Author details
Total words: 22,680
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.5% percentile 1.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles22.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst