Topic summary
76% 21 analyzed articles/videos 12,895 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Orders results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 5,817 hits . Analysis detected 53,198 faulty-reasoning hits from 59,008 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (17,556 of 24,230 topics). This Executive Orders is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. Executive Orders
Topic details
Total words: 59,008
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score21 analyzed articles59K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst