Topic summary
⁠43%3 analyzed articles/videos1,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Appointment results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 651 hits. Analysis detected 2,969 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,792 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (10,425 of 21,653 topics). This Executive Appointment is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Executive Appointment
Topic details
Total words: 4,792
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.6%13.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos