Author summary
36% 2 analyzed articles/videos 810 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drew Wilson results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 286 hits . Analysis detected 1,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,240 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (4,163 of 8,575 authors). This Drew Wilson is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Drew Wilson
Author details
Total words: 3,240
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst