Topic summary
69% 14 analyzed articles/videos 10,819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Trends results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 3,664 hits . Analysis detected 36,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 47,488 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (18,084 of 23,769 topics). This Economic Trends is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Economic Trends
Topic details
Total words: 47,488
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score14 analyzed articles47.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst