Author summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nadia Knoblauch results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 377 hits. Analysis detected 3,292 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (526 of 9,471 authors). This Nadia Knoblauch is worse (more manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Nadia Knoblauch
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠95%Nadia Knoblauch (selected)9%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,600
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

95% percentile
025507510094.5% percentile
8.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 21.8%21.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 23.6%23.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.4%14.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 19.6%19.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.9%14.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 11.6%11.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Author 23.6%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 21.8%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 19.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.9%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 13.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Author 9.9%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos