Topic summary
77% 10 analyzed articles/videos 7,173 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Policy results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 2,310 hits . Analysis detected 34,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,142 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 25% (16,755 of 22,343 topics). This Defense Policy is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group. Defense Policy
Topic details
Total words: 40,142
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles40.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst