Author summary
91% 9 analyzed articles/videos 1,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Macarthur Bosack results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 867 hits . Analysis detected 6,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,523 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (2,164 of 9,095 authors). This Michael Macarthur Bosack is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Michael Macarthur Bosack
Author details
Total words: 5,523
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.2% percentile 3.5% BS Score9 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.3% 11.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.7% 15.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.3% 11.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst