Topic summary
44% 38 analyzed articles/videos 18,284 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daylight Saving Time results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 5,264 hits . Analysis detected 61,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 100,088 analyzed words across 38 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 9% (22,552 of 24,545 topics). This Daylight Saving Time is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Daylight Saving Time
Topic details
Total words: 100,088
Article count: 38
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 1.2% BS Score38 analyzed articles100.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst