Author summary
54% 17 analyzed articles/videos 5,842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Freking results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 3,679 hits . Analysis detected 30,080 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,333 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 22% (7,389 of 9,471 authors). This Kevin Freking is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group. Kevin Freking
Author details
Total words: 45,333
Article count: 17
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score17 analyzed articles45.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst