Publication summary
59% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,881 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Santa Fe New Mexican results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 670 hits . Analysis detected 5,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,524 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 62% (226 of 584 publications). This Santa Fe New Mexican is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 7,524
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst