Author summary
33%1 analyzed article/video535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Silow-Carroll results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 131 hits. Analysis detected 1,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 56% (4,175 of 9,471 authors). This Andrew Silow-Carroll is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Andrew Silow-Carroll
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
56%Andrew Silow-Carroll (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,140
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos