Publication summary
15%1 analyzed article/video306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harrison Daily results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 526 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 79% (128 of 584 publications). This Harrison Daily is worse (more manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Harrison Daily
Publication ranking list
Publication details
Total words: 1,224
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

78% percentile
025507510078.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 1.9%1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Publication 1.4%1.4%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Publication 1.9%1.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Publication 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos