Author summary
70%1 analyzed article/video851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Editorial results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 369 hits. Analysis detected 2,887 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,843 of 9,468 authors). This Editorial is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Editorial
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
70%Editorial (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,404
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

70% percentile
025507510070.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.1%9.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.8%4.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos