Author summary
70% 1 analyzed article/video 851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Editorial results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 369 hits . Analysis detected 2,887 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,843 of 9,468 authors). This Editorial is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Editorial
Author details
Total words: 3,404
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.0% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.8% 4.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst