Topic summary
66% 9 analyzed articles/videos 7,757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Security results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 3,634 hits . Analysis detected 25,673 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,533 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (15,558 of 21,970 topics). This Data Security is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. Data Security
Topic details
Total words: 28,533
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score9 analyzed articles28.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst