Author summary
98% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,300 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Van Laar results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 839 hits . Analysis detected 9,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,200 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,442 of 8,693 authors). This Jennifer Van Laar is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group. Jennifer Van Laar
Author details
Total words: 5,200
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.4% percentile 4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 10.7% 10.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.7% 14.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.6% 9.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 15.2% 15.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.1% 14.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Burden of Proof: Author 10.7%, sitewide 0.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst