Author summary
74%14 analyzed articles/videos3,101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Washenko results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,302 hits. Analysis detected 13,063 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,083 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 59% (3,892 of 9,471 authors). This Anna Washenko is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Anna Washenko
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
59%Anna Washenko (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,083
Article count: 14
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510058.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score14 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.1%4.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate