Topic summary
54% 21 analyzed articles/videos 15,917 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyclosporiasis results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 4,465 hits . Analysis detected 39,508 faulty-reasoning hits from 62,056 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (20,322 of 22,973 topics). This Cyclosporiasis is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group. Cyclosporiasis
Topic details
Total words: 62,056
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.5% percentile 1.3% BS Score21 analyzed articles62.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 7.2% 7.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.0% 0.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
WAMU 30% 7/21/2026, 5:05:49 AM