Author summary
49% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grace Da Rocha results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 1,257 hits . Analysis detected 4,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,842 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 53% (4,448 of 9,343 authors). This Grace Da Rocha is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group. Grace Da Rocha
Author details
Total words: 7,842
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.6% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst