Author summary
63% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,321 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kashmira Gander results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Indoctrination , and Appeal to Authority , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 295 hits . Analysis detected 3,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,803 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 37% (5,609 of 8,907 authors). This Kashmira Gander is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Kashmira Gander
Author details
Total words: 4,803
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst