Author summary
33%1 analyzed article/video877 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Good News results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Loss Aversion, and Availability Heuristic, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 1,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 34% (6,275 of 9,467 authors). This Public Good News is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Public Good News
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
34%Public Good News (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,508
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

34% percentile
025507510033.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Author 11.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos