Topic summary
52% 13 analyzed articles/videos 7,991 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyberattacks results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 3,317 hits . Analysis detected 21,795 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,474 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 9% (22,275 of 24,307 topics). This Cyberattacks is better (less manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group. Cyberattacks
Topic details
Total words: 34,474
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.4% percentile 1.2% BS Score13 analyzed articles34.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.6% 9.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst