Topic summary
31% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,579 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Service results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 1,918 hits . Analysis detected 7,262 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,054 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (20,434 of 23,522 topics). This Community Service is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group. Community Service
Topic details
Total words: 15,054
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst