Author summary
69%1 analyzed article/video561 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kylie Jones results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 314 hits. Analysis detected 1,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,866 of 9,436 authors). This Kylie Jones is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Kylie Jones
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
70%Kylie Jones (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,244
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

70% percentile
025507510069.6% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.0%14.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos