Publication summary
36% 18 analyzed articles/videos 6,397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nevada Current results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 2,366 hits . Analysis detected 15,479 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,632 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 20% (447 of 556 publications). This Nevada Current is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Nevada Current
Publication details
Total words: 33,632
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.6% percentile 1.0% BS Score18 analyzed articles33.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst