Author summary
12%1 analyzed article/video754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Robison results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 203 hits. Analysis detected 1,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,304 of 8,706 authors). This Mark Robison is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Mark Robison
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
51%Mark Robison (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,016
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510050.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 5.2%5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.3%1.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos