Speaker summary
47% 17 analyzed articles/videos 331.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tulsi Gabbard results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 120 hits . Analysis detected 821.731 faulty-reasoning hits from 331.667 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (38,817 of 43,628 speakers). This Tulsi Gabbard is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group. Tulsi Gabbard
Speaker details
Total words: 331.667
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.0% percentile 9.2% BS Score17 analyzed videos331.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 17.3% 17.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 24.0% 24.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 24.2% 24.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 19.1% 19.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 15.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst