Author summary
61% 1 analyzed article/video 1,891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katheryn Houghton results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 603 hits . Analysis detected 5,124 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (5,670 of 8,840 authors). This Katheryn Houghton is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group. Katheryn Houghton
Author details
Total words: 7,564
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst