Author summary
94% 14 analyzed articles/videos 10,304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Dilanian results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 8,075 hits . Analysis detected 52,061 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,745 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (3,166 of 8,712 authors). This Ken Dilanian is worse (more manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group. Ken Dilanian
Author details
Total words: 36,745
Article count: 14
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.7% percentile 2.8% BS Score14 analyzed articles36.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.1% 8.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 22.0% 22.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst