Author summary
85% 11 analyzed articles/videos 6,616 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sydney Carruth results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 4,750 hits . Analysis detected 27,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,870 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (4,597 of 9,471 authors). This Sydney Carruth is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Sydney Carruth
Author details
Total words: 24,870
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score11 analyzed articles24.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.1% 19.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.7% 12.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst