Author summary
85% 20 analyzed articles/videos 8,460 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clarissa-Jan Lim results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 6,416 hits . Analysis detected 45,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,758 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,784 of 9,487 authors). This Clarissa-Jan Lim is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Clarissa-Jan Lim
Author details
Total words: 35,758
Article count: 20
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.1% percentile 2.5% BS Score20 analyzed articles35.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst