Speaker summary
79% 58 analyzed articles/videos 6,111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Miller results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , and Begging the Question , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 1,281.205 hits . Analysis detected 11,629.836 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,111 analyzed words across 58 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (44,704 of 45,558 speakers). This Stephen Miller is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Stephen Miller
Speaker details
Total words: 6,111
Content count: 58
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.9% percentile 4.1% BS Score58 analyzed videos6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 21.0% 21.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.4% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
NTD 100% 8/6/2026, 5:00:23 PM