Author summary
⁠33%3 analyzed articles/videos3,367 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeremiah Hayden results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 1,570 hits. Analysis detected 8,345 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,468 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (7,650 of 9,149 authors). This Jeremiah Hayden is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
Jeremiah Hayden
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠17%Jeremiah Hayden (selected)2%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,468
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

16% percentile
025507510016.4% percentile
1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.7%11.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos