Speaker summary
80% 43 analyzed articles/videos 5,040 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spencer Pratt results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 819.714 hits . Analysis detected 10,028.878 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,040 analyzed words across 43 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 2% (44,879 of 45,494 speakers). This Spencer Pratt is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. Spencer Pratt
Speaker details
Total words: 5,040
Content count: 43
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.4% percentile 3.6% BS Score43 analyzed videos5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 16.3% 16.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst