Speaker summary
62%33 analyzed articles/videos1,711.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Altman results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 338 hits. Analysis detected 2,859.939 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,711.667 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (44,215 of 45,145 speakers). This Sam Altman is better (less manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group.
Sam Altman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
3%Sam Altman (selected)5%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.1% percentile
4.2% BS Score33 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 9.7%9.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate